Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | caronte1991 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Omniscience | j4k3st3r02 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Unknown Archetype | geokh1 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Omniscience | stuliti | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Omniscience | barczek | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Last Chance #12761383 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Repurposing , Azorius Synthesizer , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Gearhulk , Bant Synthesizer , Domain Zur Overlords
Meta Performance Analysis
Riptide Gearhulk ranks #266 out of approximately 310 cards in raw efficiency (top 86%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Multi average: 42.7%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Riptide Gearhulk is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 8.44 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 71.8%. Riptide Gearhulk has a win rate of 73.8%, making it 2.8% better than other 5-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atraxa, Grand Unifier | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Angel | 7 | 81.0% | 6 |
| Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 7 | 81.0% | 6 |
| Herd Migration | Sorcery | 7 | 81.0% | 6 |
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 7 | 81.0% | 6 |
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 6 | 77.8% | 5 |
| Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 6 | 77.8% | 5 |
| Doppelgang | Sorcery | 6 | 77.8% | 5 |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 8 | 70.8% | 6 |
| Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 8 | 70.8% | 6 |
| Tear Asunder | Instant | 7 | 66.7% | 5 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Riptide Gearhulk than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disenchant | Instant | 2 | 5 | 100.0% | 79.0% | +21.0% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 32 | 76.7% | 71.7% | +5.0% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 5 | 76.2% | 72.0% | +4.2% |
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 20 | 75.4% | 71.9% | +3.5% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 33 | 75.1% | 71.7% | +3.5% |
| Unnerving Grasp | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 78.1% | 75.1% | +3.0% |
| Chart a Course | Sorcery | 2 | 28 | 76.1% | 73.8% | +2.3% |
| Haunt the Network | Sorcery | 5 | 17 | 76.0% | 73.9% | +2.0% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 29 | 74.7% | 72.9% | +1.8% |
| Grand Abolisher | Creature — Human Cleric | 2 | 29 | 75.0% | 73.3% | +1.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | 164 | 51.6% | 51.4% |
| Azorius Control | 22 | 6.2% | 36.7% |
| Unknown Archetype | 17 | 5.4% | 40.2% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 7 | 0.5% | 81.0% |
| Azorius Repurposing | 3 | 100.0% | 30.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.